Industry

The industrial sector is modeled in a more stylized way than the buildings and transportation sectors. The allocation of base year energy consumption across sectors and end-uses on a regional basis is the result of a calibration exercise bringing together information SEDS, the Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey (MECS) conducted by the EIA, the Advanced Manufacturing Office from DOE, and published NEMS results in AEO. The sectoral definitions mostly follow the categorization used by AEO and NEMS, as summarized in Table 3‑7.

Table 3‑7: Industrial sector descriptions
Industrial SectorDetailed Description
Bulk chemicalsNAICS codes 3251xx, 3252xx, 3253xx (petrochemicals, fertilizers, etc., excluding pharma)
Iron and steel (primary and secondary)NAICS codes 3311xx, 3312xx
Paper pulp and woodNAICS codes 321xxx, 322xxx
FoodNAICS codes 311xxx
CementNAICS codes 32731, 3274 (includes lime and gypsum)
AluminumNAICS codes 3313xx
Specialized ManufacturingMetal Based Durables (fabricated metal products, machinery, computers, transportation equipment, electrical equipment)
NAICS codes 332xxx, 333xxx, 334xxx, 335xxx, 336xxx
Other manufacturingGlass plus Plastics plus Balance of Manufacturing (sub-categories of "other manufacturing" in AEO tables)
All other 3xxxxx NAICS codes excluding 3241xx (petroleum refining and products)
AgricultureNAICS codes 1xxxxx
ConstructionNAICS codes 23xxxx
Mining (non-energy products)NAICS codes 21xxxx and 22xxxx excluding those associated with coal, oil, and gas primary production

Once the base year has been established, service demands for each end-use are projected based on national trends in the AEO for each industrial sector. Service demands by end-use within industrial sectors are projected to grow proportionally to sectoral output. That is, the model assumes that the relative shares of process heating and cooling versus machine drive and non-process services such as facility lighting and HVAC do not change over time, nor does the relative share of energy services in industrial output. While within-industry structural change may result from technical change, these trends are difficult to predict. However, the model does assume the energy per service unit declines over time, at different rates depending on the end-use (see Table 3‑9). These rates are exogenously specified, but the model also includes the option to accelerate the rate of efficiency improvement (at an additional cost) in response to rising energy prices.

Table 3‑9: Assumed rates of decline in new vintage energy per service unit for industry end-uses
Annual rate
Industrial Boilers0.5%
Process heating / cooling0.8%
Machine drive1.0%
Non-process industrial use0.8%

The model formulation then evaluates trade-offs between supplying service demand across a stylized set of candidate technologies corresponding to alternative fuels. The parameterization of these trade-offs is simpler than that described for buildings and transportation, but involves the same conceptual components: a relative coefficient of performance determining energy consumption and cost, and a non-energy cost component reflecting capital costs as well as productivity improvements or other service improvements. Table 3‑10 summarizes assumptions for relative coefficient of performance, that is, relative fuel use per service unit, for industrial end-uses. In this version of the model, non-energy costs are based on top-down assumptions rather than bottom-up assessments of the underlying technologies for the industrial sector. In general, electric end-use technologies are assumed to have similar or in some cases lower capital and operating costs. A priority for future model development is to refine the formulation to include more explicit connections to specific technology characteristics.

Table 3‑10: Relative coefficient of performance for industrial uses
CoalCoal (+CCS)LiquidsGasGas (+CCS)Elec
Boilers1.00.71.01.10.771.5
Process heat/cool1.00.71.01.12.0
Machine drive1.01.13.0
Non-process1.01.13.0

Coming Soon

Table 3-10 will be updated with new values.